China and the New World Order

Just another WordPress site

China and the New World Order

you’re listening to the corbett report welcome ladies and gentlemen welcome to another edition of the corbett report i’m your host as always james corbett of coming to you from the sunny climes of western japan here on the seventh day of november 2014 this is episode 297 of the corbett report podcast China and the New World Order and yes if you are just tuning in from the last edition of the questions for corporate series of course we did leave it up to the corbett report community to decide what episode 297 would be about either about the plane crash of total CEO de Margerie or china’s position in the New World Order the corporate report community has responded overwhelmingly for the China episode and I’m glad they did because this is a topic that I’ve been researching in one form or another for a few years now in earnest for the last few months and in absolute incredible detail in the past two weeks and I have a doozy of an episode for you today if you think this podcast has been informative or data packed in the past you ain’t seen nothing yet so let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work on constructing today’s narrative and it starts in a position that I think most of us will be familiar with if you are even glancing ly looking at the headlines this day and age you will note that there is an undeniable a demonstrable buildup of diplomatic financial and military tensions between the NATO powers on one side and China and its allies on the other now new warnings over cybersecurity and the growing cyber war between the US and China US officials charging members of a shadowy unit in the Chinese military accusing its agents of stealing trade secrets from American companies and the Chinese government has hit back they summoned the US ambassador to China Max Baucus for a dressing-down and they’ve also called these allegations x the episode in recent months China has undertaken destabilizing unilateral actions asserting its claims in the South China Sea we take no position on competing territorial claims but we firmly oppose any nation’s use of intimidation coercion or the threat of force to assert those claims the United States will not look the other way when fundamental principles of the international order are being challenged Beijing quickly reacted to the accusations and denounced Hagel for singling out China at a public venue the Chinese official also said the speech was completely non constructed and full of hedge emoni threats and intimidation the Treasury is once again criticizing China for failing to let its currency appreciate against the dollar for the rapid buildup in China’s foreign exchange reserves saying in this report quote both the rigidity of the REM mb another name for the yuan of course the reacceleration of reserve accumulation are serious concerns which should be corrected to help ensure a stronger more balanced global economy tomorrow they will be a formal announcement that Australian dollars can be directly traded in to remember into the Chinese currency RMB here in China the third currency in the world to do so after the US dollar and the Japanese yen this is another small step in China’s campaign to increase international use of its currency China has lodged other new currency pairs in recent years including the Canadian dollar malaysian ringgit and hong kong dollar the deal is meant to help promote business between the two countries by allowing trade without using the US dollar as an intermediary a US Navy patrol aircraft was stalked and then repeatedly buzzed by a Chinese fighter jet in international airspace this week Pentagon officials are calling it dangerous and unprofessional the u.s and Japan issued strong statements of concern over the issue and on Tuesday the United States confirmed that it flew two b-52 bombers over China’s newly established air defense zone as well as the disputed diu Islands US State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki on Tuesday expressed us concern over the issue when asked about whether the United States action should be viewed as counter provocation asaki refused to comment this phenomena as I say is fairly self-evident even if you are only looking at the headlines of today’s news but if you are only looking at the headlines then you might have missed a very different set of data indicating a very different and perhaps directly contradictory narrative one that paints China and its supposed infos in the West not as allies pitted against each other

but as partners however uneasily in some sort of alliance that will set the tone for the 21st century sir even the Rothschild joins us now to talk about investing in China and his latest venture whether central here as well save Len thank you very much indeed for joining us I just don’t want to get your views on how things have evolved has it become a more open societies with an easier place to do business oh I think it is no doubt I think it’s a remarkable country well when you think of what has happened in the last 10 years level and 20 years is is an achievement beyond recognition Richard rockefeller I’m chair of the board of the Rockefeller Brothers fund the sentiments that my grandfather and grandmother and actually other relatives of that generation had for China very positive feelings for the country passed through the generations to all of us so China in a way wasn’t such an unfamiliar place to us as it might have felt for a lot of Americans what sort of a financial deal should Obama be seeking to strike when he travels to china next month no I think this would be the time because you really need to bring China into the creation of a new world order financial world order sir Revelin what about the RMB situation you mentioned a circle currency problem I mean do you see the day in the next five years words are fully convertible and flexible well you’re talking to a person who’s quite old if I’m around in five years I’d like to think that that is the case I think we’ve all got to move towards that opportunity and I think the challenge also is whether we should move towards an international currency but they really are issues of the construction of a new world order that’s what this is about and that’s the sort of dialogue the Chinese are generally good at and as and so a partnership between us is essential a conflict between us it’s going to exhaust us both in tactical exercises it cannot be conclusive and the New World Order could satisfy both it has to satisfy both because otherwise it will lead to tensions that will exhaust us both one has to give credit to President Nixon son Henry Kissinger initiative and they broke the ice they did but they confronted a residue of suspicion and that suspicion was mutual and grievances and they were also mutual that it really took time for the relationship to sort of become more normal more predictable and eventually what we accomplished was that they came in fact open and full comprehensive and in fact initiated a kind of secret in collaboration or even perhaps you could call it an alliance and so we have on one hand the fiery and bellicose rhetoric of the would-be belligerents of the Cold War of the 21st century and on the other hand the conciliatory or even cooperative pronouncements of the usual gaggle of super Gophers the superclass identified by henry kissinger protege david rothkopf in his recent book of the same name that identified about 6,000 global actors able to implement transnational policy agendas thanks to their political and financial influence are these two positions which seemed to go head on and seem to be completely irreconcilable in fact resolvable if we look at this not as a two-dimensional surface level conflict taking place between net nation-states or groupings of nation states on the geopolitical chess board but in fact a three-dimensional problem that involves hierarchies of control buying in different levels of this game for different bun squares not just squares of a chess board but a 3d chess board if we can extend the metaphor well in fact that is exactly the position I would take and as strange as that might seem is it as as difficult as it might be to wrap our heads around that type of conflict which is happening at one level which is actually cooperation at another level it should be noted that this is not the first time in history that we’ve noticed this type of phenomenon in fact even within the past century we noticed very very similar analogous one would almost say template or product typical examples of this very phenomenon as identified by a researcher who I have name-checked a number of times on this podcast in the past so I certainly hope

my regular listeners will be familiar with his work already I am referring of course to Anthony C sudden the author of such trade books as Wall Street and the rise of Hitler wall street and the Bolshevik Revolution Wall Street and FDR but also the author of many scholarly publications academic publications that were published under the auspices of the Hoover Institute in the 1970s and that have been well so well-regarded scholarly works that were even named checked by the likes of his big new Brzezinski as being a convincing proof of their the thesis that these books were forwarding and that thesis revolved around the idea that in the case of for example the Bolshevik Revolution or the rise of the Nazis that it was the Western powers specifically the financial center of Wall Street in the Wall Street bankers who were helping to fund their supposed arch enemies the Socialists of various stripes whether that be the Bolsheviks or the National Socialists in Germany for their own agenda purposes dr. Sutton he wrote three series of books while you were a research fellow at the Hoover Institute can you give me basically the background of the content of these series yes the the series I wrote at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University concerned the transfers of Western technology to the Soviet Union and essentially comprised three individual books each book covers a period of times from since nineteen seventeen and then you wrote a second two series of books on wall street yes these were trade books in other words that they’re not academic books they’re written for the general public they concerned the build-up of the three types of socialism Bolshevik socialism in Russia and what we might call welfare socialism in United States and hit 11 on national socialism and each book examines the financing and the contributions made by Wall Street by international bankers to that to the development of that specific form of socialism but the obvious question here is why why on earth with these crony capitalists be funding their erstwhile suppose it nominal arch-nemesis rival enemies their sworn enemies the Socialists these are directly contradictory ideologies and viewpoints and economic systems why on earth with the capitalists be supporting the Socialists in various countries this seems completely nonsensical if we look at it from that again two-dimensional surface level reality but if we extend this out again to the three-dimensional hierarchical reality we start to realize that there are agendas that can be served by the crony capsule capitalists supporting command and control it caught economical structures and political authoritarian structures in various countries just tell us all over again why why it’s too many fighters in the textbooks why is to bring about I suspect they planned control world society in which you and I won’t find the freedoms to believe and think can do as we believe these power brokers and actually envision at that time a one-world government that would be socialist yes the second statement I made was that they did not want the Soviet Union to development another free enterprise society and that this would offset offset it aiding revolution would offset this event that was made as a statement in 1919 you have various books one by Gillette to the razor blade Gillette this called the city i think it was which laid out this corporate socialism for the world to see as early as what 1905 1910 so now on the turn of the century you begin to see actually written statement Spidey’s internationalist businessmen as the kind of socialist empire they wanted to bring about it’s there but these books of course are not included in your courses in political science and history at directly investors and so we’re beginning to develop a thesis that I like to think of as a revision or updating or extending of the thesis of Anthony sudden into the 21st century US vs china paradigm which again looks i think very similar in some ways to the US vs russia the US vs nazi germany paradigm of the 20th century and i say it’s a revision and updating and extending of those of that thesis because I would posit that the the the form of the thesis that this takes when we apply it towards the supposed battle between the American capitalists and the Chinese Communists is in fact the agenda

to forward the development of a system of one world government entro that involves the merger of capitalist and socialist systems into a system that basically contains the worst of both worlds we have the a Chinese version of red capitalism which represents both the command and control top-down political authoritarianism and the bankster controlled economic crony capitalism that is the model for the New World Order but do we have any evidence for this thesis this of course is the meat and potatoes of what we’re talking about today because for anyone who has not done any research into Antony Sutton’s works or read any of his books I would like to assure you that these interview clips that we’ve been looking at its hitherto or that you may have seen or heard online before are really just the summation of the years and years of extensive study that sudden did into the State Department archives and the personal correspondence various people involved the pouring over of receipts and and economic data from various corporations and all of that hard legwork that sudden did for years and years developed into academic scholarly books that eventually became trade books and we are now looking at the interviews that he did trying to summarize all of that research the actual data in that research was pretty phenomenal and phenomenally and convincingly put together by sudden over a very long period of time so no matter what this thesis sounds like or whether it makes sense or it doesn’t make sense is irrelevant it really is the data that we have to look at so let’s start putting some of those pieces on this chessboard and see if it makes sense as the new great game so let’s start with the idea for example when when sudden was talking about the rise of the Bolsheviks the rise of the Nazis he was talking about the various ways in which these movements were funded and supported and aided and and basically built into the position that they could become the dominant forces in those societies and do we have a parallel with the Communist Chinese obviously taking over the country in 1949 and being bitterly opposed by the Kuomintang of Chiang kai-shek who of course then retreated to Taiwan and the battle lines were then drawn with China of course claiming Taiwan as part of its its natural one China territory and of course Taiwan declaring itself to be an independent republic and so things stand and that’s of course the very uneasy position that we remain in today and the idea being that if China ever went and tried to militarily take Taiwan then world war three is on or something along those lines so it from the perspective of that narrative the US was obviously supporters of Chiang kai-shek and then the Kuomintang it was quite obvious that this was the case at least that’s the surface level reality is there convincing or or interesting or definitive or persuasive or whatever kind of evidence to point to the contrary that in fact this the u.s. in or not necessarily the government but influential people in this super gopher super class category we’re actually helping to support mal and the Communists and there is actually some tantalizing clues along that path I don’t think I found anything that i would call definitive I’ve heard claims for example of CIA of station Chiefs having claimed that the CIA was covertly supporting now I haven’t actually seen any of those claims though I’ve heard them talked about but I haven’t actually tracked down the claims themselves if anyone can help me with that that would be much appreciated but we’ll talk more about how you can help out with this overall investigation into China and the New World Order at the end of this episode but let’s take a look at just some of the crumbs on this cookie trail that i did find in this in the research for this podcast episode and we’ll start with an edition of the Yale Daily News specifically number 96 from februari 29th 1972 that is available for reading online on the Yale library digital library and it’s it contains a front-page story a very interesting one called malayil group Spurs mouths emergence and it’s that it started States yeah it states William F Buckley was not the only Yale figure connected with the presidential trip to China of course referring to the been recent trip to China of President Nixon without Yale support Mao Zedong main have never risen from obscurity to command China John and Spence professor of Chinese history was the first to discover mount si tongues connection with Yale the professor noted in 1919 Mao age 26 was in changsha having finished his middle school education he visited peking and while there received his serious introduction to communist thirion leak that child’s marxist study group now if

he was to develop a reputation in socialist circles he had to find a forum to propagate his views at this crucial point the student union of Yale and China invited Mao to take over the editorship of their journal Mao accepted the position and changed the format of the student magazine it would now deal with social criticism and current problems and focus on thought reorientation thought reorientation that is a very intriguing name for brainwashing or or reprogramming or whatever we want to call it but again a very tantalizing piece of the puzzle and one that has been there has been a certain amount of hay made from this there was a Yale in China connection to Mao and Yale of course the home of skull and bones so there is the specter of skull and bones over this relationship and that again has there has been some some hay made of that connection for example perhaps most notably in an oft-cited article from the nineteen january twenty six nineteen ninety addition of the new federalist call called bushes China policy skull and bones and this article reads quote George Bush the first US diplomatic representative to the People’s Republic of China back in 1973 was a member of skull and bones so where his father brother son uncle nephew and several cousins Winston Lord the reagan-bush administration ambassador to China was a member so were his father and several other relatives James Lily the current ambassador to China was a member of skull and bones as was his brother except during the Carter Administration every US ambassador to Beijing since Kissinger’s deal with Mao Zedong was a was a member of the same tiny Yale cult a mere coincidence mal was a Yalie back in 1903 Yale Divinity School established a number of schools and hospitals throughout China that were collectively known as Yale China it has since been shown that Yale and China was an intelligence network whose purpose was to destroy the republican movement of sun yat-sen on behalf of the anglo-american establishment the anglo-american establishment hated son because he wanted to develop China on the other hand they loved the Chinese Communists because they intended to keep China backward and were committed to growing dope one of Yale and China’s most important students was Mao Zedong okay we’ll end that article there there’s a little bit more that you can continue reading and that gets into for example Anthony Sutton’s work but again a fascinating piece of this puzzle but we should note for example this article in the new Federalist claims that mal was a actual student of Yale and China although the Yale Daily News claimed that he was not a student he was just invited for some random reason to edit the yale in china a journal and for whatever reason took over and started his thought reorientation or thought reorientation program that ultimately developed into the Communist Chinese movement so again a very very interesting connection and especially interesting to contemplate the connection of all of those various ambassadors to China which again up to the point of 1990 every single ambassador except under Carter had been a skull and bones member so that’s I mean obviously that’s a very interesting connection in and of itself but not necessarily definitive of anything I still think there’s probably more that needs to be made in a concrete sense in that connection but obviously a lot to ponder there and of course that does go back to the early the the founding of skull and bones in the earliest part of it which of course was the the money from the the opium trade that the the Russell trust was was the the holder of and of course that family going on to be one of the founders of skull and bones so again a lot of interesting history there but as I say nothing that definitively shows how Yale and Skull and Bones created the Communist Chinese but there is enough of a connection that I think more research needs to be done in that vein however we can tell from going forward from the time when Mao took over the country and began his absolutely abominable Great Leap Forward that resulted in the death of at least 40 million people in the starvation of that it that occurred in that for your window 40 million people starving to death during the Great Leap Forward it is really interesting and well I suppose disgusting to note the cover that he received from some very important Western politicians perhaps unsurprisingly with one of the most notable examples being French president Francois Mitterrand who of course covered for for Mao during one of his visits to China we can pick this up from the New Statesman which had a article mouths Great Famine the history of China’s most devastating catastrophe nineteen fifty eight to nineteen sixty two which starts by saying when Francois

Mitterand visited China in 1961 Mao Zedong mocked reports of famine in the country there was no famine he said only a period of scarcity an assertion that meter and who described now is a great scholar known in the entire world for the diversity of his genius was happy to accept returning to France after his three-week tour meter and had no doubts about his account of events I repeat in order to be clearly understood there is no famine in China Western politicians of the right shared the french socialist leaders view after Tory China in late nineteen sixty the Conservative MP for Chester John temple reported that communism was working and that the country was making great progress and as disgusting as that was of course another very famous or what should be very infamous example of a influential western figure backing that disgusting display that we saw under the reign of Mao was of course the 1973 new york times editorial by none other than david rockefeller under the title from a china traveler in which i think he infamously said the social experiment in china under chairman mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history again comparing that type of rhetoric to the actual actions of mao and what was accomplished under his leadership is well quite a disparity and one might ask why that would take place but I would like to draw people’s attention to a different part of that editorial one that is a much less cited in which Rockefeller writes the Chinese for their part are faced with altering a primarily inward focus that they have pursued for a quarter century under their current leadership we for our part are faced with the realization that we have largely ignored a country with one fourth of the world’s population when one considers the profound differences in our cultural Heritage’s and our social and economic systems this is certain to be a long task with much accommodation necessary on both sides very interesting passage not least of which because one might well ponder who is exactly meant in that we and our is that America as a whole or does that have more to do with rockefeller his obvious banking and oil interests his other ties to the financial and and oligarchical late I I think the latter more so than the former but regardless I think that this is actually the in a couched sense the a reformulation of our thesis that ultimately the plan the long-term game plan has been at least since the time of the 1970s and the opening up of China the very idea of merging China’s inward focus and its top-down control with the ideas that the the West was seeking to import in terms of economic social historical systems very interesting so how did how is this actually accomplished again it’s one thing to talk about it in generals how about in specifics well of course we’re talking about David Rockefeller intence 1973 speech her op-ed in favor of the great socialist revolution of mal but it’s interesting to note that the 1972 trip of Nixon to China we get the famous Vulcan phrase for Star Trek six fans in the crowd only Nixon could go to China but actually the phrase shouldn’t be only Nixon could go to China because Nixon was preceded in his 1972 visit china in nineteen seventy one in a series of secret meetings that were eventually revealed of henry kissinger to beijing it was Kissinger of course who paved the way for Nixon to normalize relations with China and who is Kissinger and who does he work for well again we don’t have to dig very deeply for this knowledge in fact we could turn to that bastion of truthiness Wikipedia if it’s written there it has to be true right it’s certainly mainstream if it’s written there so again from David Rockefellers own Wikipedia entry quote in Henry Kissinger Rockefeller found a political operative with an international and domestic perspective similar to his they first met in 1954 when Kissinger was appointed a director of a seminal Council on Foreign Relations study group on nuclear weapons of which David was a member the relationship developed to the point that Kissinger was invited to sit on the board of trustees of the Rockefeller Brothers fund Rockefeller consulted with Kissinger on numerous occasions as for example in the chase bank’s interest in Chile and the possibility of election of the election of Salvador I end day in 1970 interestingly and fully supported his opening of China initiative in 1971 as it afforded banking opportunities for the chase bank oh yes in this formulation it was Rockefeller supporting Kissinger’s initiative to open up China rather than the other way

around yeah sure sure wikipedia hiya I believe that one but regardless of the relationship Kissinger Rockefeller two peas in a pod with the same agenda to open up China from the Mao era of great leap forward and then the Cultural Revolution which was an interesting time in which mounted a very astute political maneuver let’s not say that he was a stupid man he was a disgusting horrible cruel a perverse person probably the greatest mass murderer in the history of the world but he was not necessarily a stupid man and one does not retain control over a country for that long in those types of revolutionary situations without some political politically astute moves and the cultural revolution in some ways although this needs a large degree of fleshing out but can be seen as a type of counter evolution instituted by Mao against the counter revolutionary tendencies that were taking place within his own party again it was an interesting maneuver to get the people against the Chinese Communist Party which was turning against mouth so that he could retain his power an interesting setup but at any rate the Cultural Revolution was the was what occurred after the Great Leap the utter disgusting horrific failure of the Great Leap Forward which managed to maintain mouths control over the country and then after that point at the point where the handover took place and mal was out of power we started to see a new generation of Chinese leadership taking over and this is where the story gets extremely interesting and connects again with these same figures of Chase Manhattan of Rockefeller Kissinger all of these figures come together at a very interesting point and we’ll take this from a 1986 work by Michelle chossudovsky towards capitalist restoration where he writes quote the 1979 visit of dung Xiaoping to the US was followed in june nineteen eighty by the equally significant encounter in wall street of wrong year in chairman of CITIC and david rockefeller the meeting held in the penthouse of the China of the Chase Manhattan Bank comp complex was attended by senior executives of close to 300 major US corporations a major agreement was reached between chase siddik and the bank of china involving the exchange of specialists and technical personnel to identify and define those areas of the chinese economy most susceptible to american technology and capital infusion end quote extremely interesting well now we have a very solid lead a very specific point on which to start building our case and this is again the confluence of this wrong you rent which i’m probably mispronouncing and let me just of course add the caveat to any Chinese speakers in the crowd that I apologize for butchering your language and every single name in this episode of the podcast wrong you Ren the chairman of CITIC which is obviously something that deserves more scrutiny with David Rockefeller the Chase Manhattan Bank 300 major US corporations meeting and engaging in a large agreement on technical and specialist exchange of information and personnel to identify and define those areas of the Chinese economy most susceptible to American technology in capital infusion so who is wrong you and who what what what was sidik what where did this come from how does this relate to the the the presidency of dung Xiaoping well let’s start boiling this down in a fascinating little piece of this puzzle that was provided by Bloomberg a couple of years ago of course this is not exactly hidden knowledge that was never known before this Bloomberg report but it was interestingly summarized in December 27th 2012 Bloomberg report errors of mouth comrades rise as new capitalist nobility this is a fascinating story about what was a group that was known as the Eight Immortals and yes I am not making that up there known as the Immortals and this is a group a new class of of people who have arisen on that were connected to eight people specifically who survived the Cultural Revolution of mal and were in high-ranking positions in the chinese communist party to start implementing a very different agenda from mouths agenda in the reign of dung Xiaoping so picking up from that article quote the people generally known as the Eight Immortals are now all dead though all but three lived into their 90’s their stature in China is on a par with that of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson in the u.s. they are dung Xiaoping general Wang who fed mouths troops Chen Yin who took charge of the economy when malp assumed power in 1949 Li Chen Yin who was instrumental in the plot that ended the Cultural Revolution pengcheng who helped build China’s legal system in the 1980s

song Wang Chung the party personnel chief who oversaw the rehabilitation of purged cadres after the Cultural Revolution president yang who backed dongs ordered to carry out the 1989 Tiananmen Square cat cracked and Bo Yibo a former vice premier and the last of the Immortals to die at 98 in 2007 or in the Chinese pronunciation of these names the cal king boy oh boy genuine some ranchy on pompton wanted lakenya young hunk Windham limit continuing with the bloomberg article they emerged from the Cultural Revolution after Mao’s death in 1976 during which many of them had been in internal exile to find an economy in ruins gross domestic product in 1970 was 165 dollars a person compared with 22,000 462 dollars in the US with Japan South Korea Taiwan and Hong Kong booming the Immortals were surrounded by capitalists success stories the victorious communists had executed landlords after 1949 farms had become people’s communes factories belong to the state the Immortals turned that on its head in the 1980s farmers could lease land private enterprise at first on a small scale later bigger was tolerated than encouraged dong took the gamble that in order to stoke growth some flies and mosquitoes could be tolerated said at azra vogel an emeritus professor at Harvard and Cambridge Massachusetts who wrote a 2011 biography of dung alright so there you go there is in a nutshell the Eight Immortals and their progeny which now are still in control of so many different facets of the state controlled economy there in China that it is extremely interesting via not strictly state controlled anymore the now private enterprise / state control hybrid system that china is prototyping for the new world order system and it’s interesting I mean it’s fascinating to look at these eight families and the way that their connections continue to to wailed inordinate amounts of power over the political and economic life of China and there’s more on that in this story in Bloomberg and other stories that have been published in Bloomberg in various pieces of this puzzle that will be found in a million different places which I’m going to ask you or helpful in helping to connect some of those pieces later on in this episode but let’s continue on and picking up that thread from the Eight Immortals and their their influence back to what we were talking about earlier with that secret meeting in 1980 with Chase Manhattan and Rockefeller meeting with younger en you rear end of the siddik group well that ties in to this story of the Immortals reading again from that bloomberg article within months wang jian the general son that’s general Wang one of the Eight Immortals was made head of business operations at the newly formed sidik known then as China International trust and investment corporation the group founded by wrong year n was set up to attract overseas investment at a time on the country’s foreign exchange reserves were 840 million dollars he turned it into a sprawling empire to drive China’s growth Civic now runs China’s biggest listed securities firm baxa Beijing soccer team and develops luxury real estate projects China’s reserves today stand at three point three trillion dollars 840 million to three point three trillion so that gives you a sense of what citic is and how it relates to the current Chinese hierarchy but let’s let’s focus even more closely in on that wrong year-end character who in june nineteen eighty was meeting with rockefeller at the top of Chase Manhattan complex in Manhattan we can find this from an obituary to wrong irin that was that was run in the time of his death so this obituary entitled the death of China’s red capitalist and the 1949 revolution reads in part quote in civics first year of operations wrong met with 4,000 foreign businessmen he also enlisted Henry Kissinger the former US Secretary of State who established diplomatic relations with Beijing in 1971 as one of the company’s main international advisors wrong facilitated investment by building infrastructure in the free trade zones and helping foreign firms set up operations philip wang a hong kong dela beck delegate to China’s National People’s Congress told the China Daily on october 28th if not for his wrongs ability and vision in setting up sidik the pace of economic development in china would not have been so fast by 1992 wrong citic had become a business empire involved in shipping power generation and construction today citic has 200 enterprises around the world in total assets of 6.3 billion u.s. dollars that in that was to 2005 acidic developed so did wrongs private businesses in 1979 he sent his son Larry

wrong to Hong Kong to manage his investments there in 2005 Larry wrong was named by Forbes magazine as china’s richest man with a fortune of 1.6 four billion dollars billion with a be wrong senior also played a key role in the further opening up of the Chinese economy after the suppression of the anti-government protests in May and June of 1989 dung Xiaoping justified the massacre of workers and students in Tiananmen Square on the grounds that it was necessary to defend the socialist system in reality it was aimed at crushing the opposition of the working class to the impact of the regime’s free-market policies free market yes an interesting little bit of propaganda snuck in there in 1993 wrong was promoted to vice president of China as a symbol of Beijing’s determination to accelerate market reform as the obituary to wrong in the British Financial Times noted the post was mainly ceremonial but it sent a clear message China’s new blend of communist politics and market economics was here to stay and it was the red capitalist who had shown the way the same year China received 111 billion dollars of contracted foreign direct investment nearly four times the amount that had been invested in the entire ten year period for nineteen seventy nine to nineteen eighty nine and quote very interesting character and you will notice the little bits of propaganda and the little bits of the narrative that are already being inserted into this in very very subtle but very powerful ways for example it’s the free trade it’s the capitalist aspects of this this siddik in these types of organizations that are to blame for the the incredible oppression and political oppression that we saw at Tiananmen Square and that we’ve seen in various other contexts from Beijing that’s that’s somehow to do with the the free market system with capitalism because of course when we’re talking about these eight immortals and their progeny controlling hundreds of billions trillions of dollars ultimately if we include the Chinese reserves in all of these various corporations these state controlled corporations this is somehow free market this is somehow the the example of capitalism so you’ll see the way that certain pieces of the narrative are inserted here to try to create false paradigms that are again at that two-dimensional stage it’s capitalism versus socialism and they butt heads and and oh look what results and there are other aspects of this that I think are worth highlighting for example when Heinz Kissinger himself poses something that I think is also becoming another idea that is pushed in this China versus the u.s. narrative which is that well you know when you think about it militarily and impact from the perspective of empire the Chinese are kind of the good guys the Chinese believe in the superiority of their cultures the uniqueness of their culture and they are they delighted and proud if you respected but there’s no way you can become a Chinese it is not a if you are not part of the Chinese culture and pull into the Chinese culture you cannot become one so it’s hard to imagine Chinese armies intervening somewhere to make Chinese culture think about the Chinese governing principles that is not a Chinese way of thinking the Chinese way of thinking is that the majesty of the Chinese conduct in the achievement of Chinese society will inspire respect which leads to a cooperative action but it’s not one that they have historic they attempted to bring about by military force they’ll use military force if they feel themselves threaten and ruthlessly but it’s hard for me to visualize a Chinese military strategy designed to back up a Chinese world government even in the name of universal peace and so here’s the narrative that becomes kind of the the counter narrative to the the mainstream narrative which is propagated in the West which of course is that the US and NATO are the good guys in this cold war scenario well of course there has to be a counter-narrative an alternative narrative that is subtly injected into the conversation by people like Kissinger who have been intimately involved with the creation of the this

red capitalist system since its inception as we’ve already detailed in various ways in which we will continue to detail but he gets to insert certain things that become part of the counter narrative as well like oh well China they don’t go out and militarily invade other countries they’re the good side of the the New World Order and so I think that’s another thing that we and the alternative media really have to be careful about is what counter narratives are we propagating and are they truly counter to the system that is being established are they truly counter to the mega-billionaire financial elite interests that are puppeteering this butting of heads of the capitalist and socialist system well let’s let’s continue what specifically resulted from these increasing ties through organizations like siddik which very attentive listeners of this podcast will remember from our examination of the the Power Corporation and the demo day family in Canada which managed to get an interest in and ultimately sat on the board of citic pacific which was a hong kong subsidiary of siddik which is the same citic which was wrong ear n working with the rockefeller and everyone at Chase Manhattan in the 300 US corporations to establish this us-china tie so again that the layers are so deep there are so many different facets to this story but they interlock and they are fascinating when you start going down this rabbit hole but let’s take a look at some more specific examples of what actually eventuated from this and in order to do that we can look for example at even what is Spragg de bout openly by the Beijing government itself literally the government of Beijing specifically which has a post on their website I Beijing govt Sen fortune 500 investment in Beijing CBD drivers of foreign investment in China and the new R&D models as it can be oh sorry I’m reading from the wrong I’m reading from the wrong document well I have so many documents that I can’t keep track of them all and that should be a little reminder and I should take a moment to once again state of course the show notes for this episode are available at corbett report com copious show notes with links to all of the documents that we’re talking about so that you can start to a piece some of the pieces of this very interesting puzzle together for yourself but let’s turn to again this fortune 500 in important engine driving Beijing CBD economic development on the Beijing government website which notes that there has been an exceptional increase in fortune 500 investment in China over the past decades and then in the 1990s we have the fortune 500 500 enterprises setting up investment companies in Beijing and it goes through the history of that and then after 2000 they set up regional headquarters in Beijing so you’re getting the idea we have the gradual build-up of the financial the economic the productive even the investment capacity of four and fortune 500 which we should read as the corporate members roster of the Council on Foreign Relations for example that’s all interlocking is is growing steadily throughout the 1970s the opening up the 1980s the 1990s and then the two thousand a present region so we of course are looking at China generally from 2000 on with it’s a remarkable zit ten fifteen percent deck GDP growth rate just it’s blistering pace of economic growth over the past decade and as if that sprang out of nowhere and was not the concerted and and deliberate product of a very regimented agenda that has been at work for decades now and that has been rigorously planned out from behind the scenes a bit be by the crony capitalists and the immortals in China and their and their progeny so again there’s an interesting little graph that shows some of the examples for example just charting the the the the progress of Fortune various fortune 500 enterprises at the beginning of the opening up in the 1970s HP and matsushita set up offices in 1979 in the neighborhood of the Beijing embassy HP China limited was established in Beijing in 1985 and Beijing matsushita color CRT company limited was established in 87 HP china investment company was established in 1995 and Matsu china limited in 1994 HP bought HP building in in beijing CBD in 1998 and moved several branches to the building in 2002 message the limited was transferred to a regional headquarters so again we get the sense there is this bill build up and there’s just a couple of examples of some of the companies that are involved in this but there are many many many more as detailed in an article that i wrote earlier this year and that’s available on of course again the link in the show notes to an article i wrote called the great decoupling how the West is engineering its own downfall

again more about this idea of this sort of phony cold war and how it’s being used for political purposes to engineer a new world order a one-world system which notes quote the chinese industrial juggernaut did not just spring up overnight the infrastructure for china’s economic marvel of the last decade was laid in the decade before in the seven years from 1994 to 2001 alone direct investment of us-based multinational corporations in china quadrupled from 2.6 billion to 10.5 billion in the same period china rose from the 30th largest target of us R&D investment to the 11th on the back of a doubling of us affiliates in the country though of companies that started major R&D activities or facilities in China in the 1990s reads like a who’s who of the CFR nested fortune 500 set DuPont Ford General Electric General Motors IBM Intel lucent technologies Microsoft Motorola and Roman has all had a significant stake in China by the beginning of the 21st century and then the economic boom suddenly springs out of nowhere right interesting part of all of this is the fact that it was of course framed as the offshoring of productive capacity of course we’re using China for their cheap labor that’s why all these companies went to China but the part of this that doesn’t make sense is the incredible boom in R&D funding that began in the 1990s and continued through the 2000s period why was there all this investment in R&D in China that’s different from the productive sort of menial labor which one can understand you’re going to pay basically slave labor to do menial tasks like Foxconn or whatever but why R&D specifically outsourcing that to China and there’s an interesting report that I uncovered that deals with this problem specifically drivers of foreign investment investment in China and the new R&D models from UTA edu and that’s a fascinating report for a lot of different ways including the way that it tries to deal with that idea why are these why were these foreign companies suddenly investing in R&D in China and it concludes for example as can be seen a great deal of research has focused on China and how global companies have moved much of their production capability to that country however this research has overlooked the growing amount of research and development that these firms have undertaken in China in fact China has seen the development of new models of rd by Fort foreign corporations so again this R&D investment did not spring out of nowhere it was again a part of a coordinated agenda that involved some of the largest corporations on the planet and this report also lists some of the countries that heavily invested in R&D in the 1990s motorola nokia siemens IBM Microsoft GM sanks on nortel GE JVC Intel P&G DuPont ericsson matsushita Mitsubishi loosen Bell and AT&T to name a few all have R&D facilities in China Microsoft for instance invested a hundred and thirty million dollars to establish its research institute and Microsoft Asian technology center in China Motorola established 18 R&D centers in China by the end of two thousand this included an initial 300 million dollar investment and 1060 research personnel etc etc again this economic marvel of China over the past decade did not spring out of nowhere it is the end result of what has been happening for decades as part of agreements that were reached decades before that so we have to understand this deeper level of what’s going on to understand what’s happening at the surface level and that I think gives further bolstering to our argument that what’s happening is not the 2d surface reality of nation-states pitted against each other but the 3d hierarchical reality of the super Gophers at the top puppeteering a system whereby they can play nation-states against each other to create a global governmental system that will ultimately be this merger of capitalism and socialism this red capitalism whatever they want to call it and of course they will not call it red capitalism it will not be called anything like that but we are seeing the merger of these systems in various ways but again there’s so much to be said here um well let’s talk about another key aspect of what of what Anthony sudden talked about when he was talking about the Western backing of the Bolsheviks or the Nazis it was not just financial support it was not just the the the development of Industry it was also technology transfers in fact that was the specific focus of suddens early work at the Hoover Institute the technological transfers that enabled the rise of the Soviet Union into an industrial superpower from it’s basically feudal society before the Bolsheviks took over and and in that regard it was sudden argument that without the US technological transfer and technological support the Bolsheviks couldn’t have accomplished what they

ultimately did and similarly the Nazis couldn’t have built up their war machine without the synthetic oil that was provided under specific agreements that Standard Oil had with their German counterparts to provide the technology to create the synthetic oil that fueled the the German Nazi war machine that again could not have functioned without that so is there technology transfer going on in China the answer the short answer is yes there are technology transfers from the West to China that have enabled certain specific military capabilities that the Chinese now have the question is how deep does this go and how many layers there are I will provide just one layer because this is already a huge investigation and it’s only going to expand in scope from here but a fascinating one that developed in the 1990s which was a series of stories about basically the transfer of nuclear technologies technologies that helped aid china’s space program its missile technologies its nuclear technologies including the transfer of microchips and things that happened on in the clinton administration so it was framed in that left-right debate as if this was some sort of you know leftist agenda as opposed to again the bush is supporting the Tiananmen Square massacre the Clintons supporting with technology transfers its left right blue red fork spoon it makes no difference the agenda is the same and it’s being forwarded by the Rockefellers and the kiss enters and people on that level not the political puppets who are paraded in front of us as the shadows on Plato’s cave wall let’s take a look at this in more detail this story and we can get this from first of all I mean the good place to go would be the official report US commercial technology transferred to the People’s Republic of China from the Bureau of export administration office of strategic industries and economic security defense market research report which is a fascinating report about how this technology transfer occurred the executive summary of which reads the phenomenal economic growth witnessed in china since dung Xiaoping first declared China’s open-door policy in 1978 has led many to predict China certain emergence as an economic superpower in the early 21st century indeed China has followed a structured path toward global a tour gradual market reform if it’s still largely state-owned industrial sector which has been transfused with increasing amounts of foreign capital and technology there have been numerous reports over the last several years however of US companies being forced forced in quotation marks in the report to transfer technology to China in exchange for access to this enormous market the purpose of this study is to assess the extent to which US commercial technology is being in effect coerced from US companies engaged in normal business practices and joint ventures in China in exchange for access to china’s markets the cumulative effect these transfers may have on China’s efforts to modernize its comedy economy as well as its industrial and military base is also examined finally the study addresses the impact of us technology transfers to China on the issues of long term us global competitiveness and broad economic and national security interests and at the end of this report it notes although it is not possible to make a clear determination of the US national security implications of commercial US technology transfers to China the continuation of the trends identified in this study could pose long-term challenges to US national security interests the study does not identify any specific Chinese military advances made as a result of us commercial technology transfers but does suggest that continued pressures on foreign high-tech firms to transfer advanced commercial technologies if successful could indirectly benefit China’s efforts to modernize its military this report was written in 1999 so before the Chinese economic juggernaut got underway in earnest it was already well known that these corporations which were flocking to China to set up their R&D centers and to move its head up corporate headquarters and all of these other major investments that were taking place were being done on agreement that this would include technology transfers to the People’s Republic of China that maybe could be used to build up China’s military base and now lo and behold wouldn’t you know what China is modernizing its military at an exceptionally rapid pace with aircraft carriers coming online latest aircraft carat carrier killer missiles that they’ve developed the drones technology that now is a fast approaching that of the United States again it’s a military truck or not that that’s still in the process of building up but it is being built up and how so again this this type of report gives us a window into that process a process that again could not take place without the active support of the very financial and corporate oligarchy that has been wedded to the Chinese immortals and the Chinese regime that’s been in place at least since the death of Mount fascinating

stuff I hope you will agree some more specifics we can get on for example the Chinese military the missile allegations the allegations of specific technology transfers regarding missile technologies there’s a Washington Post series of articles from the 1990s on on this that I’ll throw a link into it’s an interesting compendium of dozens of reports that were compiled and filed in the 1998 time period i have a report china possible military technology transfers from us satellite export policy actions and chronology from a you AF mil us this is an interesting one Bush’s brother has contract to help Chinese chipmaker talking about one of the bushes so I don’t even remember which one without looking at the article itself and his intimate ties to a a Chinese chip maker in the brouhaha that caused for george w who was in power at the time also um yes it was Neil Bush who also just a couple of years ago made headlines for this Neil Bush communist photo makes a scene on Chinese social media site label and it’s uh it’s Neil Bush wearing Communist Chinese regalia saying am i doing it right basically you know it’s all funny it’s all fun and games to these people um then that again is just the taste of the idea of what what we’re really trying to drill down to which is the specifics that Anthony sudden throughout in the Soviet or Nazi paradigms we wanted to construct the same case for what’s happening with communist China because again this is about the creation of the one world government assistant a place without a the nation state systems warring and ruining each other and oh please save us oh luckily there’s this model the stress sure that’s already been put in place that can come save us of you know some sort of you n type structure that will function like the red capital the red capitalist of China or something of that sort and there this also cannot take place without the active cooperation and the financial the corporate infrastructure that has been carefully laid out for decades now in agreements between people like Ronny Rehn and acidic and those types of groups with such things as the US China Business Council and other extremely fascinating lee interesting groups now as you can imagine just sorting today’s episode out into what I’ve presented so far has been a mind-boggling event and I’ve had to leave out all sorts of different things that would have to sent us in different directions this podcast could probably be split into 10 different podcasts a series and I suppose it will be and that’s what I’m going to call on all of you out there now to help engage in this task of following these different cookie crumb trails and going down the various rabbit holes and digging up what you can find I’m calling on the corporate report members the the community that is developing at the corporate report open source intelligence news community to help assemble some of these facts get some of these names follow some of these leads follow the careers of some of these characters and the various dealings that they’ve done to help flesh out this picture that we’re painting here because it is an exceptionally important one that tells a very different story of what we’re being asked to believe that there is a us-china rivalry and that there’s going to be some war because they’re so at each other’s throats that is taking place at the surface level but there’s a much deeper level of what’s taking place in the third dimension that is much more important in the overall game plan do not get caught up in choosing sides as if choosing a nation state or a NATO vs Shanghai Cooperation Organization or one of these phony controlled organizations is going to make a difference at the end it’s a dialectic and it’s going to smash these two seemingly opposed systems into each other and what’s going to result is going to be horrific on the scale of what chairman mao instituted in his great leap forward so it couldn’t be more important what’s have right now and I think this is the perspective from which we have to view such things as what’s going on in Hong Kong right now where people are upset at the Beijing government now there’s all sorts of manipulations that happen and things that are taking place in the two-dimensional nation state system version of any d in all of these usual players getting involved in this conflict but this is part of the conflict that is planned we have to see it at a deeper level and support the people against these various government and corporate manipulations that have been designed and are taking place so this is the level of analysis that we have to get into if we really want to understand what’s taking place with China in this current day and age and this is where i’m going to call on you for help i have some various things that just as suggested starting points obviously take this any way you want but here are some suggested starting points for where we need to go from here first we need more information on technology transfers you can start using some of the articles that i’ve cited you can

look for your own but i want more specifics about technology transfers that have taken place from the west to china that have enabled specifically chinese military technology i find that interesting but also the Chinese cyber capabilities the fact that they have the most controlled internet on the planet which again is a very complicated thing to do when something that I don’t think could have been done without the active support and collusion of technology companies for example so there are some starting points for the investigation I want to find out more about the financial interlocks between specific fortune 500 corporations and the red capitalists and in that regard I think it will be extremely important to follow up on that bloomberg article about the Eight Immortals those eight families and their descendants and where they’ve gone and how they populate and and connect with other people there’s an interesting article i saw that connects so many of these different characters that it was a bit mind-boggling to even glance through that i’ll include in the show notes at this precise time index so you can go and find that article and start sorting through some of those leads i want to look at specific organizations like not only the WTO and IMF and other organizations that china is a part of that are clearly part of this global governmental but some others that are less scrutinized but I think no less important like the US China Business Council which changed its name to the National Council for us China trade still existed today it was set up 40 years ago in my preliminary research for this podcast i could find barely any information about the historical founding of this group and who was actually its board members and when it was founded and who specifically founded it and in what way in and all anything to do with the history of this group I know that Rockefeller has been an advisor to this group I know kissinger has been lauded and given Awards by this group but specifically there have been allegations that I’ve read that this group was founded by the likes of Rockefeller and Kissinger I if there is more information on that more solid leads that we can take this to that would be great uh how about thinking about this in terms of global monetary order which is going to come out of this merging of the systems and in that regard we can look at the interlock between the Bank for International Settlements the central bank of central bank’s identified by Carol quickly as the absolute apex of the financial pyramid and the pboc the People’s Bank of China and i’ll throw in some links to some various articles that i think are interesting with regards to the for example a UH some sort of symposium that took place recently the People’s Bank of China bis research conference that I think will be interesting as well as some comments that have been made in recent years by various PBOC officials about how basically what is needed is to add the one to the IMF currency basket for these special drawing rights the SDR which many people speculate is the instrument that is going to take over as the US dollars the world reserve currency some interesting leaves again I’ll throw those links in the show notes so you can follow through with that a fascinating looking debate that I haven’t had the chance to watch yet I’m again I would love to have the time to have watched this but we got to put this podcast up at some point so it was a monk debate which takes place in Canada it’s always an interesting debate from a from a propaganda perspective you have to through the propaganda but it’s interesting and this debate was will the 21st century belong to China on the pro side Niall Ferguson and David Delk wheelie on the con side Henry Kissinger and Fareed Zakaria so a CFR Bilderberg globalist super gopher tag team there and they ended up winning that debate in sin to incidentally making the argument that China will not be the power of the 21st century make of that what you will so all of those leads again there are so many more that we can take this is obviously just the first report in what will be an ongoing research investigation into this I don’t know what form it will take more podcasts more interviews more articles I’m sure will result from all of this research but it is up to you guys out there please help me out in this compile the links if you are a corporate report member please sign in to the website and leave your posts on this leave your comments on this post so that we can start compiling this research into into a more fleshed out detailed schematic of what we’re talking about again i hope i’ve placed some of these pieces on the board in a way that the picture comes into view and that you see that this is a system that’s being puppeteered in a three-dimensional reality not the 2d nation state system fight that we’re being asked to believe that it is i will leave you on one final note again going back to Anthony C sudden who wrote in 1984 in America’s secret establishment by about the year 2000 Communist China will be a super power built by American

technology and skill how did Anthony C sudden no that was he clairvoyant was he a psychic could he read the future was he informed about history was he in effect an armchair quarterback who like any good armchair quarterback knows the opposing teams playbook so well that he can reliably predict their plays at any rate we will leave you there for today this has been the final episode of the corporate report podcast before my trip to Europe so in until December there will be no further episodes of the corporate report podcast proper there will be a film literature numeral order episode around the time that I’m leaving there will be a hopefully at least one video next week but other than that the website is going to be very quiet for the next couple of weeks as I really will be working very hard on my lectures and then delivering lectures so don’t look for too much activity at corporate report com but I hope I’ve left you a lot to chew on in the meantime so again corporate board members please start contributing to this open-source investigation of China and the New World Order once again i’m james corbett of looking forward very much to talking to you again in the very near future thank you for your time shahbaz a noggin watch your [ __ ] no gun hsinchu de Chivo Hodes bottom topi dumb chew oh sure so warm i under time to do to fool the colbert report is brought to you by you your support makes the corbett report possible sign up for the subscriber newsletter or purchase a DVD at corbett report com / support